Sunday, July 22, 2018

Chapter 7: Satanic Panic


Chapter 7: Satanic Panic

This was the most difficult chapter to get through for me. I found myself regularly having to go back and reread sentences and whole paragraphs because I had checked out or the information I had just looked over had initially left me in total disbelief. Perry’s descriptions of “holding”/”attachment” therapy, the role of social contagion in America in the early 90s around “Satanic Ritual Abuse,” the fad of “recovering” traumatic memories, and the firm adherence to these beliefs and therapeutic models by many professionals in various and relatively socially powerful positions were painful and infuriating to read about. I was most horrified by how the children in Gilmer who had been sexually abused by their family members were tortured further by being transported across the state, subjected to coercive and physically assaultive methods of treatment that were unsupported by any kind of evidence, and manipulated by caregivers, caseworkers, and the judicial system to confirm these adults’ own beliefs about the events in the small east Texas town.

Although horrifying, the history of this mass hysteria and the coercive methods used by the caseworkers, foster families, and prosecutors in the Gilmer cases are not particularly surprising. Perry described adults in therapy who look for the “Rosetta stones of their personal histories” and attempt to find solutions to their current issues in daily functioning by searching for the one traumatic memory that with explain and “resolve” their problems. Instead of learning to cope in the present and validate for oneself that life can be stressful, isolating, and overwhelming in and of itself (even in the absence of a history of childhood trauma/abuse/neglect), some adults will seek out alternative explanations to validate their daily experiences and feelings of already-justified fear, anxiety, sadness, etc. I drew a parallel from Perry’s commentary here to how the adults in this chapter acted and may have perceived the children in Gilmer who had been subjected to horrific abuse. Instead of working through their own feelings of disbelief, sadness, and anger around the cases, they sought out a “better” explanation (e.g. Satanic Ritual Abuse) for why the abuse occurred, perhaps to help themselves feel more at ease. However, just as daily life can be inherently overwhelming for an adult with a severe mental illness that has no roots in childhood trauma, the sexual abuse experienced by children in Gilmer was inherently horrific and required no kind of outside justification or explanation in order to effectively care for them. Providing empathy, understanding, and appropriate care and allowing a client to determine what exactly it is that they might need is almost always more important than intrusively digging into their past (in this case, via coercive interrogation and holding therapy), and it would have only served to benefit the children in this case.

By the end of the chapter I wondered what, if any, care was offered to these children after the criminal and custody cases had ended, and if they would even be able to trust another mental health professional in the future. I think Perry effectively modeled how building a safe, strong alliance with them might look if they or their caregivers sought out care again.

3 comments:

  1. You do bring up a good point about how it seems that people want a "quick fix" to the issues that a person has and seem unwilling to go through the work to actually resolve the problem. I think that we see that though the over-medication that is rampant in psychology, especially with children. I don't want to blame the parents, but I think that its easy to say "oh they have ADHD, so we put them on Adderall" rather than adjusting lifestyles and giving the child a chance to work through the excess energy, etc. I wonder if the "satanic ritual abuse" was a way to blame any issues that a person has on previous "unconscious" memories, rather than thinking through the issues and tackling them one by one.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Carly,

    Thank you for sharing your thoughts! Your reflections on this chapter gave me so much to think about. The confusing and disturbing nature of the information provided in this chapter also made it hard for me to get through it. I was really surprised to learn about the fad of “recovering” traumatic memories. It shocked me that therapists were encouraging people to seek help by saying that 90% of families were dysfunctional. This fact alone would be enough to make any uninformed adult want to rush to therapy!

    It is interesting to think about how some adults in therapy are looking to find a “Rosetta stone of their personal history” to explain their current dissatisfaction with life. I feel like most people want a quick, effortless fix to their problems and blaming issues on your upbringing could provide a temporary “solution”. Unfortunately, the etiology of mental health issues is far more complex than just looking at a person’s upbringing. While working through a legitimate traumatic childhood experience can be crucial to the therapeutic process, it is also necessary to pay attention to the current problems at hand. Personally, this is the struggle that I have with psychoanalytic therapy. I do not know all the ins-and-outs of psychoanalytic therapy, but I think this type of therapy can sometimes focus too much on the past and ultimately impair a client’s ability to live in the present. I am interested to learn more about how to best address a client’s past, while also remaining focused on their current experiences. It sounds like quite a tricky balance!

    -E. Sterling

    ReplyDelete
  3. You made a great point that completely slipped my mind, the aftermath of this disaster. What did happen to these children after they were returned to their homes, I hope they would receive the therapy that they received, but I'm highly doubtful of it due to current system they were in and because of the thought that "children are resilient" so they'll forget about this experience.

    Even if they did receive treatment you are right, how can they trust a therapist again when the person that was supposed to be "helping" them was literally digging and/or having someone else dig their fingers into their rib cage to coerce them into reporting things that weren't true, ultimately separating them from their loving family (in most of the cases) and placing them into a foster home where they were further abused and left with trauma. It was a never ending chain of traumatic events for this children, and I'm sad to say that I'm doubtful that they received the care that they needed.

    ReplyDelete